Enforcement Actions - W

Using the first letter of the individual’s last name, select the letter group below that corresponds. This will display enforcement actions for the corresponding letter group.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Each page of the Enforcement Actions section is divided into subsections for citations, administrative actions, and convictions. You should check each subsection to see if an enforcement action has been taken against the individual you are seeking.

Citations
Disciplinary Actions
Convictions

Citations

Carison C. Wade

Oakland —The Board issued a three-count citation that included a $2,000 administrative fine to Carison C. Wade, architect license number C-20004, for alleged violations of BPC 5558 (Business Entity Report) and 5584 (Willful Misconduct) and CCR section 160(b)(2) (Rules of Professional Conduct). The action alleged that Wade was paid for inspection services by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development but failed to pay his contracted Consultant, licensed in Hawaii, for inspection services; failed to respond to the Board’s requests for information within 30 days in regards to an investigation, and failed to provide the Board with his current name and address of the entity through which he provides architectural services. The citation became final on February 26, 2015.

Aaron Douglas Walker

Oregon City, OR —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $250 administrative fine to Aaron Douglas Walker, architect license number C-30368, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Conditions; Certifications; Audit; False or Misleading Information; Disciplinary Action; Coursework Regarding Zero Net Carbon Design; Submission of Letter to Legislature). The action alleged that Walker certified false or misleading information on their 2023 License Renewal Application. Walker paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on February 4, 2025.

Kevin Waters

Los Angeles —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $750 administrative fine to Kevin Waters, architect license number C -25786, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code (BPC) section 5588.

On or about June 20, 2019, the Board was notified of a $4,000,000 settlement Waters had entered into on or about June 7, 2019, which had not been reported to the Board. Waters acknowledged the settlement on or about March 12, 2020, in response to a contact letter from the Board dated February 14, 2020.

Waters explained that the CEO of the firm he worked for, Walker Parking Consultants, had handled the claim, and that although Waters had his deposition taken and was in attendance at an early mitigation meeting, he was “unaware the claim was settled.” Waters’ failure to report a settlement over the amount of $5,000 in a case alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness is a violation of BPC section 5588. Waters paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on February 7, 2022.

Earle Edward Weiss

Mill Valley —The Board issued a three-count citation that included a $1,500 administrative fine to Earle Edward Weiss, architect license number C-22416, for alleged violations of BPC 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect), 5536.22(a)(5) (Written Contract) and 5584 (Negligence). The action alleged that while Weiss’ license was expired, he executed a written contract to remodel an existing convent in San Francisco, California. The contract was on "E.E. Weiss Architects, Inc." letterhead, described the "Proposed Architectural Services" to be performed, contained the words "Architectural" and "Architect(s)" throughout, included Weiss’ signature next to the title "Architect," and did not contain a termination clause. Weiss also failed to confirm the height of an existing entry deck to the convent, thereby designing a ramp that would not satisfy accessibility design standards. Weiss paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on July 14, 2016.

Sonsire Coromoto West

La Jolla —The Board issued a three-count citation, including an administrative fine in the amount of $3,500 to Sonsire Coromoto West, an unlicensed person, dba Scott A. Spencer & Associates, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code sections 5536(a) and California Code of Regulations title 16, section 134.

On or about November 4, 2022, West was hired by J.B. (client) to design plans for a new accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on Edgeview Street in San Marcos, California. The contract amount was $3,500, which the client paid in full. As the project moved along, the client noticed issues and inaccuracies on the permit application, and West's delays caused the project to miss an end of the year filing deadline. West would make excuses as to why she could not complete the work, refused to send the client copies of the plans, and eventually stopped taking calls or responding to emails.

The client believed West was an architect, as she had identified herself as such in communications and in her contract. In a text message dated November 3, 2022, West told the client "But I'm a Architect." The contract contained the following:

Page 1 "ARCHITECTUAL CONTRACT/ PROPOSAL"
Page 1 The Subject is listed as "ARCHITECT"
Page 2 "…Architectural Plans to HOA Board Approval"
Page 3 "ARCHITECTUAL FLOOR PLANS" listed twice
Page 3 "ARCHITECTUAL FEES" listed twice
Page 4 "EXPENSES THAT ARE TO BE REIMBURSED…Fees paid by the Architect"
Page 4 under RETAINER includes, "Architectural fees quoted…"
Page 5 "ARCHITECT DATE"

Instead of West's address, the contract listed the address of licensed architect Scott A. Spencer (Spencer, C-33340). The plans created by West also contained Spencer's title block, which included his name, his firm name, contact information, and license number. The client believed that Mr. Spencer was the architect of record on the project and would stamp the plans, as his title block was on the plans. The client reached out to Mr. Spencer through his contact information on the plan's title block because she believed Mr. Spencer was West's employer, and liable for the work West provided.

The Board determined that West is not an employee of Mr. Spencer's firm, and that he had no knowledge of the project until he was contacted by the client because she was trying to get in touch with West.

West's online profiles listed her specialties as "Architecture & Interior Design" and used job titles that contained the terms "Architect," and "Architectural." They also listed her as Project Manager at Mr. Spencer's firm since 2018.

West's correspondence and contract wherein she used the titles of "Architect" and described her services as "Architecture" and "Architectural," are devices that might indicate to the public that West is an architect or qualified to engage in the practice of architecture in California. Such conduct constitutes violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) and California Code of Regulations title 16, section 134. West's representation of her company as an architecture firm by using Mr. Spencer's title block is a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a). West's online profiles wherein she used the titles of "Architect" and "Architecture Assistant" and described her services as "Architecture" and "Architectural" are devices that might indicate to the public that West is an architect or qualified to engage in the practice of architecture in California. Such conduct constitutes violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a). The citation became final on May 12, 2024.

Tommie Williams

Carmichael—The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,500 administrative fine to Tommie Williams, dba The Williams Design Group, an unlicensed individual, for violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect) and California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 134(a) (Use of the Term Architect). The action alleged that Williams entered into a contract to produce design construction documents for a residential project located in Fair Oaks, California. The contract included the statement, “ALL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING WILL BE COMPLETED ON OR BEFORE…” Further, Williams’ business card stated, “Specializing in Architectural Design” and included the title “Architectural Designers.” The citation became final on December 5, 2020.

Michael M. Wong

Oakland —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Michael M. Wong, architect license number C-25736, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Conditions; Certifications; Audit; False or Misleading Information; Disciplinary Action; Coursework Regarding Disability Access Requirements; Submission of Letter to Legislature). The action alleged that Wong certified false or misleading information on their 2023 License Renewal Application. Wong paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on June 27, 2025.

Archibald C. Woo

San Francisco —The Board issued a two-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Archibald C. Woo, architect license number C-25649, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a)(3) (Written Contract) and section 5558 (Mailing Address and Name and Address of Entity Through Which License Holder Provides Architectural Services; Filing Requirements). The action alleged that Woo was hired to provide architectural services for a renovation of an existing space located on Grant Avenue in San Francisco, California for a total fee of $8,000. The contract failed to include Woo’s name, address, and license number. Woo’s failure to include his name, address, and license number in the written contract for the above-referenced project constitutes a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a)(3). Woo paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on September 11, 2021.

Chang Kil Woo

Fullerton —The Board issued a one-count modified citation that included a $2,000 administrative fine to Chang Kil Woo, dba CW Designs, an unlicensed individual, for alleged violations of BPC 5536(a) (Practice Without License or Holding Self Out as Architect). The action alleged that Woo’s company website, cwdbinc.com, described his services as "Architectural" and contained the meta tag keyword "Architectural." Woo’s company was also categorized under "Architects" on the website yelp.com, and Woo’s advertisements for his company on the websites citysearch.com, ehardhat.com, ezlocal.com, getfave.com, hop.stop.com, local.dispatch.com, local.yahoo.com, mapquest.com, merchantcircle.com, pennysaverusa.com, plus.google.com, yellowbot.com, yellowpagecity.com, and yellowise.com offered "Architect & Engineering Plan Services." In addition, Woo’s advertisement for his company on the website losangeles.craigslist.org described his services as "Architectural," included the title "Architect," and contained the keywords "Architect," "Architectural," "Architecture," "Professional Architect," and "Stamped." The citation became final on May 16, 2016.

Sara Louise Woodfield

Santa Rosa —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $500 administrative fine to Sara Louise Woodfield, architect license number C-23108, for an alleged violation of CCR 160(b)(1) (Rules of Professional Conduct) and BPC 5584 (Willful Misconduct). The action alleged that between July 2014 and March 2015, Woodfield performed tenant improvements to a building she purchased in Santa Rosa, California; however, Woodfield failed to obtain the legal permits to do those improvements. On or about May 12, 2016, Woodfield received a Notice of Violation from the City of Santa Rosa for performing the tenant improvement services without proper plans, permits, and inspections, after a tenant of an office space in the building filed a complaint with the City of Santa Rosa Planning Department Code Enforcement. Woodfield paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on June 13, 2017.

James Christopher Wright

Anaheim —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1000 administrative fine to James Christopher Wright, architect license number C-29967, for an alleged violation of Business and Professions Code section 5600.05(a)(1) (License Renewal Process; Conditions; Certifications; Audit; False or Misleading Information; Disciplinary Action; Coursework Regarding Disability Access Requirements and Zero Net Carbon Design; Submission of Letter to Legislature). The action alleged that Wright certified false or misleading information on their 2023 License Renewal Application. The citation became final on March 14, 2025.

Chiou-Yeong Wu

Rowland Heights —The Board issued a one-count modified citation that included a $250 administrative fine to Chiou-Yeong Wu, architect license number C-26073, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a) (Written Contract Requirements) and California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 160(f)(1) (Informed Consent). The action alleged that on or about October 22, 2018, Wu prepared a written contract to provide Mr. W.C.C. (client) with schematic design, design development, and construction documents for an existing garage conversion to be permitted as an Accessory Dwelling Unit located on Hollis Street in Hacienda Heights, California for a fixed fee of $3,800. On or about October 22, 2018, the client signed the contract and provided Wu with an initial payment of $1,900. The contract did not include Wu’s license number. In an invoice to the client, dated July 26, 2019, Wu billed $1,520 for a second payment, $200 for “Additional works for unpermitted addition to existing garage,” and $380 for a third payment. The “Additional Services” provision in Wu’s contract stated that the additional services shall only be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the owner. There was no written document with the client’s permission to do this “additional” work, and this led to a dispute over the fees. Wu’s failure to include his license number in the written contract for the above-referenced project constitutes a violation of Business and Professions Code section 5536.22(a). Wu also materially altered the scope of the project without obtaining the consent of his client in writing, a breach of his contract and violation of California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 160(f)(1). Wu paid the fine, satisfying the citation. The citation became final on June 11, 2020.

Stella Wu

San Mateo —The Board issued a one-count citation that included a $1,000 administrative fine to Stella Wu, an unlicensed individual, dba Eano Home Renovations, for alleged violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a) (Holding herself out as an architect).

On or about December 2, 2021 Wu’s company website stated, “Meet with our architectural and project management team and receive a quote” and offered, “an Eano architect to share your vision for the project” and “Your architectural and project management team.” In addition, Wu’s company Apollo website profile stated, “For homeowners, we deliver reliable and seamless custom design and build solutions, including architectural designs…” and under Employees included a “Project Architect,” “Architectural Project Manager,” and “Architectural Designer.” Wu’s company LinkedIn profile stated “For homeowners, we deliver reliable and seamless custom design and build solutions, including architectural designs…” Further, Wu’s company Yelp profile was categorized under “Architects” and stated under Specialties, “We provide an all-in-one experience from city permit processing to design and planning with in-house architects and experienced contractor team with 10+ year's of experience.”

Wu’s company website, Apollo, LinkedIn, and Yelp profiles, wherein Wu described herself as providing “architectural” services and designs, used the titles of “Project Architect,” “Architectural Project Manager,” and “Architectural Designer,” and categorized her company under “Architects,” are devices that might indicate to the public that Wu is an architect or qualified to engage in the practice of architecture in California. Such conduct constitutes violations of Business and Professions Code section 5536(a). The citation became final on June 2, 2022.

Disciplinary Actions

Philip Gordon Wire

Woodside —Effective January 5, 1999, Philip Gordon Wire’s Application for Re-Examination for the Architect Registration Examination was denied after the Board adopted a Proposed Decision ordering denial. The decision was based on Mr. Wire’s criminal conviction in June 1995 of engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture. The facts underlying the conviction were that in April and May 1994, as an unlicensed individual, Mr. Wire submitted sets of plans to the City of Cupertino which included a stamp containing his name, the title "architect," his signature, the words "Registered Professional Architect, State of California," and a fictitious license number. During the course of these projects, Mr. Wire identified himself as the architect on the projects to the local building officials. An additional ground for denial was Mr. Wire’s failure to pay a $500 administrative fine which arose out of a citation which had been issued in October 1993 by the Board against Mr. Wire in a separate incident of engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture.

Convictions

There are no convictions to display.